Connect with us

Airline News

Which Countries Generate the Most Air-Travel Emissions?

Published

on

Lately, the “flight shaming” movement has come to the attention of the travel community, especially in Europe, where activist groups insist that consumers should use alternative modes of transportation, such as train travel, in order to reduce their carbon footprints.

It’s true that travelers have become increasingly aware of passenger air travel’s degree of impact on climate change and many are making conscious efforts to make more eco-friendly choices. With today’s cheaper air-travel options and more people flying than ever before, should we be feeling guilty every time we step aboard a plane?

Trending Now

A new study conducted by the International Council for Clean Transportation would seem to indicate otherwise. Its findings suggest flying doesn’t account for much of the average American’s carbon footprint, Forbes reported. It turns out that more than half of American citizens do not typically fly at all. Even so, the U.S. holds the top spot globally for the highest total carbon emissions produced by commercial aviation activities.

In 2018, flights departing from U.S. airports alone generated nearly one quarter (24 percent) of all CO2 emissions produced by airline operations worldwide, two-thirds of which resulted from domestic flights. The second-worst offenders were China, Hong Kong and Macau, which were responsible for thirteen percent of global emissions, while the U.K. came in third with just a four-percent share, following by Japan and Germany.

The real problem in the U.S. stems from a particular subset of air travelers—airlines/airlines-want-travelers-to-use-up-those-frequent-flyer-miles.html” target=”_self” rel=”nofollow noopener noreferrer”>frequent flyers who fly excessively as a luxury, rather than a necessity. Twelve percent of Americans who take more than six round-trip flights annually are actually responsible for a full two-thirds of all U.S. CO2 emissions produced by commercial aviation.

Each of those travelers accounts for three tons of CO2 emissions annually. If we all flew like these people, global oil consumption would increase by 150 percent and CO2 emissions from fossil fuel use would rise by 60 percent, says the new report.

For more information, visit theicct.org/publications/co2-emissions-commercial-aviation-2018.

This post was published by our news partner: TravelPulse.com | Article Source |

Comments & Discussion

Airline News

IATA: Damage to Air Travel Will Extend Into 2023

Published

on

Any comeback by the beleaguered airline industry will extend into 2023, according to new data released by the International Air Transport Association (IATA), the airlines’ main trade group.

Long-haul travel will continue to lag behind and passenger fears about flying in general will contribute to the delay, Lonely Planet reported.

IATA estimates that passenger traffic won’t rebound to pre-crisis levels until at least 2023. It expects that global passenger demand in 2021 will be 24 percent below 2019 levels and 32 percent lower than the forecast the association made in October 2019.

The new data is based on a slower opening of economies and relaxation of travel restrictions. Lockdowns and shelter-in-place orders could return if the virus comes back strong in the fall and winter with a second wave, as some health officials have predicted.

In addition, another contributing factor is quarantine measures that have been instituted by various countries as well as individual states in the U.S. According to IATA, 69 percent of recent travelers that it surveyed said they would not consider traveling if it involved a 14-day quarantine period once they arrive at their destination. IATA is asking governments to find alternatives to the quarantine measures.

Of course, all of this is contingent upon the public’s willingness to fly—and instilling confidence in that will take time, said IATA’s director general and CEO, Alexandre de Juniac.

“To protect aviation’s ability to be a catalyst for the economic recovery, we must not make that prognosis worse by making travel impracticable with quarantine measures,” he said. “We need a solution for safe travel that addresses two challenges. It must give passengers the confidence to travel safely and without undue hassle, and it must give governments confidence that they are protected from importing the virus.”

This post was published by our news partner: TravelPulse.com | Article Source

Comments & Discussion

Continue Reading

latest episode


Advertisement
Advertisement

Jet Set on TheGo!

Travel News & Exclusive Deals delivered right to your inbox weekly!
* indicates required

Trending